Why I support the repeal of the PTPTN
As'kum wbt .. I just shared the opinion .. as usual can agree, can object .. any idea with the argument most welcome .. this is not hate speech, so please, be civilized and knowledgeable When Giving comments or anything ..
N sori, if there are parts I use English (some rojak la) ..kadang2 can use BM, kadang2 nk I say one thing I BI plaque probe, ahaha .. ye la I blaja pounds in BI UiTM my all ..
So PTPTN .. why I support the repeal of that? Because nyer predicate given with the intention and effect of education itself ..
stop2 ok, before pegi jauh2, I want to ask what is education for?? Sebenarnyer education to what? One of the all-time famous Reasons for education is to uplift the people .. is not it?? Education is working to raise the status / quality of life / civilization .. dlu skola my religion I blaja I just did with the degree of knowledge we can increase ye not, not with rank, wealth, etc2 .. its logical right, I mean right now - with no new degree nyer la cket bleh demand more pay .. If a large school leavers not pay the right (if I live to eat salary is - if it does not matter what business you have scroll down) ..
Ok to be honest, That was a poor choice of example .. the Advancement of a human being, or the act of uplifting the people through education can not be Measured solely on the description of job That payment is based on your academic Credentials (diploma, degree, PhD, etc) .. its a logical fallacy to conclude a human being is definitely and undeniably uplifted just by the fact That he secured a university diploma limit and goes out working in a factory for the rest of his life .. I mean do you define success Lifelong That way? Wage earners live life - what about your contribution to society??there's a lot of things to consider Is not it ..
In conclusion, the important question Should we ask ourselves: "Have we really uplifted the people just by making sure hire are paid more?" Not really, in my opinion ..education is not about being paid more, its about maturity and development through the inclusion of more knowledge ..even within the limited scope of job payment - more does not equate enough .. 800 ko say the original salary, any approval of seniority can I increase the salary of RM1200 .. so increased la, tp is not meaningful enough tu nk salary to live - or just want to raise the standard of living of a person (a thousand times more than enough to nowadays? new taste 3 thousand more comfortable with a bit) .. gets worse if I have to pay PTPTN mamat plaque - so please pay up tp je more debt byk .. Posted aspects of the new Ni salaries, terms of hardware - not Posted maturity of thought, openness of mind, way of life, social awareness, etc2 .. I like you all I can be a bit now, a society paid more I do not mean that people learned societies betul2 ..
OK, so for now let us st aside the many Defining atrributes That would Qualify in determining the uplifting of our people ..let us focus solely on the Monetary Aspect (more on the socioeconomic status) .. Why do I dock I cite plaque about salary? Because Malaysians That is WHY GO TO COLLEGE.That is why in fact most people in the whole world go to universities .. We went to U, because of what? nk for diploma / degree / masters / phd / proffessorship etc2 all .. I want to get all the approvals plaque why?? YES, I WORK FOR .. and want more money when you work it right?? because I want people who amek original degree diploma - that can die pay more .. right its a general truth ..
p / s: I'm not here to Debate or expand upon the problem of Top Malaysians being sold to the myth That everyone needs to go to universities, OR that anyone needs to go there in a time or a certain age. The linear depicition of success in life (study well - score at schools - go to university - get a job-Happily ever after) is of course detrimental and erronous in nature, but that is for another time perhaps.
Jadik nyer leading question I ask - does the system of tertiary education (university, college, etc2) in our country I betul2 a system I raise the living standard of Malaysians in general in our country? I think, in konklusifnyer not .. lg la with the PTPTN .. apesal that?? I is not PTPTN to help pay so and so I am going to enter U study - say, visited hang pi does not help??
Yes, there is close, my bg did you made a mistake ..masalahnyer skrg every time there is for Malaysians to pursue my higher, money suddenly became important issues I (ye la, want to work with SPM mintak je?) .. dlu primary with no secondary shares, tp I want to jack up the tertiary level automatically tangled about money .. so what so and so be able to do if you do not? mintak scholarships and assistance .. pounds if I can .. course of the scholarship / sgt assistance is limited - so camne with dozens (possibly hundreds) of thousands of young people I want to continue their studies near U?? Yesss, die to be in debt! Jadik nyer great majority of Malaysians I want to continue education (to improve the quality of life) ends up with another debt to pay - which when finished studying die die have to pay more than I die borrow ..so what do you see - you will see the majority of our young people when they get out U will continue to be in middle-income trap! in U bertahun2 study purportedly raise my standard of living, tp out with debt and a significant increment of Sita until I can guarantee a decent living (I maybe associated with low-wage in Malaysia - and of course I jugak taken) .. And in the end, I do not think there is the profit here??I'm not well versed in economic / business stuff, but considering Thousands upon Thousands of young Malaysians Annually applying for a Loan - someone IS MAKING MONEY RIGHT HERE!
you see, the reason I applaud the idea of Abolisihing PTPTN is not Because I do not want to pay my debts - I applaud Because its the next best thing, Which is free education. I am willing to pay my PTPTN debt - in fact, I do not really support the idea of abolishing the debts of PTPTN holders, I support the abolishment of PTPTN itself. Why?? One Because it seems unfair la, orang2 dlu payable sume, so I had to borrow have to pay it all .. jugak Could use government besides the money .. highlight, after this, JAP I owe the people of Malaysia semata2 I need to pursue prefer .. When I free education - new education see it properly could elevate a person's life ..golongan2 low income do not have to worry about financing - dieorang promise eligible children and want to learn .. the idea of scholarship is good, but its good only in uplifting a select few, "academic elitist 'of our society, correct? camne-fry night market traders so far I die 4A SPM jack? imagine how besarnyer change if everyone, regardless of background and economic status are no longer limited with the financial problems in higher education get nk .. Malaysia then the people look more broadly educated, right??
Some people do not see - camne PTPTN repeal shall be brought to free education? based on my link below I:
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/194706
Future funding model
For future education funding, the proposed Rafizi including:
Back to the practice before 1996 when the government provides a full higher education
and not dependent on the private sector to reduce the cost of study.
Build ten public higher education institutions (IPTA) in ten years, with a target of 100,000 places, with expenses - including fees and living - borne by the government.
Provide new education fund for students in private higher education institutions (IPTS) and living expenses that require a smaller financing.
Institutions to encourage mergers to reduce the use of loans and thus can increase its competitiveness with the public, including a reduction in fees and costs of the program.
other links (PKR biased media, be warned):
http://www.keadilandaily.com/keadila...njama-ptptn-2/
Of course when JAP lg PTPTN - who I want to pay the cost of education, accommodation, all I - many can not afford right je? the answer is obvious, government pay la ..
But with the emergence of pulak government issues is not enough money, that Malaysia would be bankrupt if the idea I continued .. again, I'm not well versed in economic / business stuff .. When the very government but famous for its Corruption and money wastage (eg: NFC abes2 cow .. why not? best reason eg I - bright lg vast majority) Claims it does not have enough money - Hey, That sounds about right don ' t you think?? I habes money to other places where I just .. say what you want - but it will never convince me .. you have to understand, that's the general perception nowadays ..
p / s: as a side note, boldly claimed PKR That even with the corrupted government currently hire can still pay for the abolishment of PTPTN .. follow the link given for more info;
http://www.keadilandaily.com/hapus-h...-diselamatkan/
But obviously I know the method (as in how it is achieved) is debatable, but I will not nitpick on the Methodology, let others with expertise Ponder upon That stuff .. Since PR proposed the idea, lets see how hire are supposed to make it happen ..If they do not make it happen - hire will pay .. Simple as That ..
People who side with government plaque empty promises I will say the opposition was politically motivated - just want a lot of votes .. Well, I'm not an ***** - of course its political .. the intentions are obvious - but the idea is still good ..Government's bold talk for BR1M not politically motivated?RM200 book vouchers not politically motivated? assists or not, of course it helps .. sebelum2 tp ni pon JAP .. I want to close it the next general election macam2 .. handout culture in order to gain money is soo mediaevel popularity .. both sides are so sebenarnyer the same, both are trying to gain votes ..the problem is there is no clear guidelines to differentiate between the MACC by Manifesto and political Bribery .. Right now there is no level playing field, nil - things are always in Favor of the government - media coverage, funds (taxpayers' money or money party?), Etc2 .. as long as the issue is not addressed, as long as I la debates chapter 'political promise' / 'political corruption' I will not run out ..
Extending Top - national issues arise plaque I practiced tax free education I dieorang expensive .. Yep, I know .. That But for me - so what? Raise the tax la, I do not mind paying .. add je "education tax" .. Posted betul2 free education to make sure la .. Malaysian masalahnyer I die duk measure progress with the construction of physical objects .. build large buildings, new buildings, new bridges, new cattle farms - tor I finished takpe tax money .. Infrastructure is important, sure - but human development - education through Should be more important and be given higher priority .. besar2 building, cantik2 (read: rich contractors and related org) tp Baek people do not have to be left behind brain .. Skrg, PR Propose my cube bg free education without tax impose eminence - that's part of the online statement, I know ..Whether we'll wait n see hire deliver or not .. Posted did not deliver, claiming it! bg jugak not change back jadik BN government .. what difficulty?
PKR answer tax-related issues I raised:
http://www.keadilandaily.com/hutang-...bilion-rafizi/
And finally to be issues IPTS (Institute of higher education) will be bankrupt, could not be welcome .. well, I do not see a problem with That .. jadiknyer if IPTS want to compete, I do not want to be la dieorang lower fees .. I as you know, fees IPTS expensive .. and you leh read what the PR approach I want to tackle that issue (refer close "the financing model of the future" at the top this and that I be given jugak link2) ..
One thing I like to mention here .. How does IPTS / IPTA operate? I think both are Operated with a business like model in mind .. In the end, its about making money .. different universities with more breast IPTS bg I Posted I control, I jack .. Public government, private bodies IPTS plaques (state government know there is power in determining who appointed / administer the university .. I remembered, UCCA is abolished, not eliminated .. so akta2 relevant government interference in university administration still there) .. Ok so why do I talk IPTA / IPTS I more interested on making money?in the end I die I maintain is a new student entry .. must maintain no - the money in. .. It apa2 sekalipon offer course, either course of conduct I, where I conduct certificate or not the back story .. Institutions for la seems to be plausible, so I nk bg public eg la .. It is best eg ME TO DO IT YOURSELF.yes, pemilik2 ISMP (Bachelor of Education) .. in any batch of I (grad year early cute coats) Posted war still want to get a posting (batch I toksah dream la) - pi government alih2 bukak near U lagik ISMP application .. people like me pon weird - I co pegi bukak again for what?? terlebih2 I do not know to this?? placement of docks say no / no need tp pegi bukak more .. Posted, strange laaaa .. I la kiteorang I feel neglected and marginalized terang2 (ye la, dock prefer 'pihak2' other - my quote tanak here) junior kiteorang not probe further melambak U tuuu .. Abes I grad tomorrow I will want to work what? kiteorang remember being happy to degree education in the field laen want? I nyer eg, Biology Education .. takleh keje lab or anything, because I do not have enough subjects BIO hours (credit hours) .. camne ha tuh?
The fact That most people are learning for the sake of getting jobs - not for learning itself is bad enough .. but now people are not even getting jobs When hire graduate? that's just sad .. very sad .. they've wasted years learning things for hire probably do not want to learn, graduating with a debt, and practically jobless.
That is the hope when PTPTN expired - i n government to bear, at least government education institusi2 pressure leh ni (for reduced fees, costs, dramatically improved quality, etc.) ..Burden if I close nyer we, Malaysians, normal people - we JAP direct authority .. We can boycott - but I do not see happening anytime soon That (-_-) ".. Hopefully education would no longer be centerd upon the means of gaining money, or 'goldmine' for a certain people / Organisations .. Hopefully in the future it is focused more as a means to uplift people and padat a society as a whole Greater. that's kinda one of the core roles of a government, do not you think??
Of course, the Debate of education institution operating a business like model requires more critical analysis supported by related literatures and researches - That Which I have none. So the above paragraph is more on personal analysis and assertions. I welcome any additional information, or critical reveiws Opinions - from anyone.
CONCLUSION
How can you uplift if Malaysians in general people need to be in debt in order to gain better education, Which translates to better socioeconomic status?
The business model in education, geared at making money is unhealthy to say the least.
Education is one of the most fundamental and basic needs a government need to provide to its people.
One side is willing to do it, saying it can be done .. while the other side is not willing, saying it is Impossible. To me the choice is obvious.
Ok, I think I jack at the moment I .. I want to emphasize again I all my ideas and arguments here are personal views, and it can jadik correctly, can jadik one .. I apologize if terkasar language, tu n apa2 is wrong, please correct .. if nk added apa2 ideas, can je - please .. God willing, we make something useful discussions I ..
p / s: feel free to untag urself .. I tag sape2 jack interested I think I - I pass takpe pounds.
-End-
No comments:
Post a Comment